Deputy Attorney-General Justice Srem Sai has strongly criticized what he calls “one-sided” extradition deals, making it clear that Ghana won’t back any global anti-fraud framework that unfairly singles out African suspects without ensuring equal accountability from all sides.
Speaking on the opening day of the Global Fraud Summit, held under the auspices of the United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime and INTERPOL, he stressed that Ghana’s participation in any international agreement would depend on fairness and mutual legal cooperation.
He argued that existing proposals risk creating a system where cybercrime suspects are routinely extradited to Western countries, without equivalent mechanisms to return stolen assets or extradite individuals accused of political corruption back to Africa.
“Ghana will not support an arrangement that establishes a one-way traffic of extraditing cybercrime suspects to Western countries,” he stated, adding that the country would only back a framework that ensures faster extradition of corruption suspects and the recovery of looted funds.
The summit is exploring the development of a global legal framework to combat cross-border fraud, a growing concern amid rising cybercrime activities worldwide.
His comments come at a sensitive time, as Ghana navigates high-profile extradition cases involving both local and international interests.
Authorities are currently seeking the extradition of former Finance Minister Ken Ofori-Atta from the United States over decisions taken during his tenure.
At the same time, Ghana is processing a request from U.S. authorities for the extradition of Frederick Kumi, also known as “Abu Trica,” who faces charges including conspiracy to commit wire fraud and money laundering.
The Gbese District Court is expected to rule on March 25 on a preliminary objection challenging the legal basis of the extradition process.
READ ALSO: Mahama Cracks Down on Rent Exploitation, Urges Tenants to Report Illegal Advances
Lawyers for the accused, led by Oliver Barker Vormawor, argue that the offences cited are not covered under the 1931 extradition treaty between Ghana and the United States. They contend that neither wire fraud nor money laundering is explicitly listed as extraditable offences under the agreement.
The defence further insists that Ghana cannot rely on newer domestic laws to expand the scope of the treaty, maintaining that all extradition proceedings must strictly adhere to the original terms agreed between both countries.
The unfolding developments highlight growing tensions around international legal cooperation, as Ghana signals it will demand balanced partnerships that protect its legal sovereignty while tackling global fraud.
